0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.16 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 1200 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 10:54:25 EDT 2021 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.37 % Number of cores: 8 0.15/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.15/0.38 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.15/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.72/0.92 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic h208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I 0.72/0.92 # and selection function SelectVGNonCR. 0.72/0.92 # 0.72/0.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.079 s 0.72/0.92 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.72/0.92 0.72/0.92 # Proof found! 0.72/0.92 # SZS status Theorem 0.72/0.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_8_correctCompositionKS__neg1, axiom, ![X15:secrecy_specID, X11:secrecy_specID, X12:secrecy_specID, X217:secrecy_KS]:((((~(member_Secrecy_KS @ X217 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X15))<=~(member_Secrecy_KS @ X217 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X12)))<=~(member_Secrecy_KS @ X217 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X11)))<=correctCompositionKS @ X15)<=(subcomponents @ X15)=(insert1671894227specID @ X11 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X12 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_8_correctCompositionKS__neg1)). 0.72/0.92 thf(conj_0, conjecture, ~(member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ pq)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_225_Un__insert__right, axiom, ![X448:set_Secrecy_specID, X449:secrecy_specID, X450:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ X448 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X449 @ X450))=(insert1671894227specID @ X449 @ (sup_su1712599557specID @ X448 @ X450)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_225_Un__insert__right)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_292_sup__bot_Oright__neutral, axiom, ![X117:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ X117 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)=(X117), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_292_sup__bot_Oright__neutral)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_0_cCompKS, axiom, correctCompositionKS @ pq, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_0_cCompKS)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_3_subPQ, axiom, (subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_subPQ)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_265_Un__empty__left, axiom, ![X56:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ bot_bo1785112429specID @ X56)=(X56), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_265_Un__empty__left)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_2_notKSP, axiom, ~(member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ p)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_2_notKSP)). 0.72/0.92 thf(fact_1_notKSQ, axiom, ~(member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ q)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_1_notKSQ)). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X15:secrecy_specID, X11:secrecy_specID, X12:secrecy_specID, X217:secrecy_KS]:((subcomponents @ X15)=(insert1671894227specID @ X11 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X12 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))=>(correctCompositionKS @ X15=>(~member_Secrecy_KS @ X217 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X11)=>(~member_Secrecy_KS @ X217 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X12)=>~member_Secrecy_KS @ X217 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X15))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_8_correctCompositionKS__neg1])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1950:secrecy_specID, X1951:secrecy_specID, X1952:secrecy_specID, X1953:secrecy_KS]:((subcomponents @ X1950)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X1951 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X1952 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))|(~correctCompositionKS @ X1950|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X1953 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X1951)|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X1953 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X1952)|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X1953 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X1950))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ pq), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X2381:set_Secrecy_specID, X2382:secrecy_specID, X2383:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ X2381 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X2382 @ X2383))=(insert1671894227specID @ X2382 @ (sup_su1712599557specID @ X2381 @ X2383)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_225_Un__insert__right])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1726:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ X1726 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)=(X1726), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_292_sup__bot_Oright__neutral])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X11:secrecy_specID, X21:secrecy_KS, X5:secrecy_specID, X1:secrecy_specID]:(member_Secrecy_KS @ X21 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X5)|member_Secrecy_KS @ X21 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X11)|(subcomponents @ X1)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X11 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))|~correctCompositionKS @ X1|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X21 @ (specKeysSecrets @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ pq), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_16, plain, correctCompositionKS @ pq, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_cCompKS])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X25:set_Secrecy_specID, X26:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ X25 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X1 @ X26))=(insert1671894227specID @ X1 @ (sup_su1712599557specID @ X25 @ X26)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_18, plain, (subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_subPQ])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X25:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ X25 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)=(X25), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X1590:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ bot_bo1785112429specID @ X1590)=(X1590), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_265_Un__empty__left])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_21, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ p), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_notKSP])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_22, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ q), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_notKSQ])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X5:secrecy_specID]:(member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ X1)|member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ X5)|(insert1671894227specID @ X1 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))!=(subcomponents @ pq)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X25:set_Secrecy_specID]:(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ X25))=(sup_su1712599557specID @ X25 @ (subcomponents @ pq)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_17]), c_0_19])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X25:set_Secrecy_specID]:(sup_su1712599557specID @ bot_bo1785112429specID @ X25)=(X25), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_26, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ p), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_27, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (specKeysSecrets @ q), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.72/0.92 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_25])]), c_0_26]), c_0_27]), ['proof']). 0.72/0.92 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.72/0.92 # Proof object total steps : 29 0.72/0.92 # Proof object clause steps : 12 0.72/0.92 # Proof object formula steps : 17 0.72/0.92 # Proof object conjectures : 5 0.72/0.92 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3 0.72/0.92 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2 0.72/0.92 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9 0.72/0.92 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9 0.72/0.92 # Proof object generating inferences : 3 0.72/0.92 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8 0.72/0.92 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.72/0.92 # Parsed axioms : 447 0.72/0.92 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.72/0.92 # Initial clauses : 826 0.72/0.92 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 116 0.72/0.92 # Initial clauses in saturation : 710 0.72/0.92 # Processed clauses : 6187 0.72/0.92 # ...of these trivial : 240 0.72/0.92 # ...subsumed : 3362 0.72/0.92 # ...remaining for further processing : 2585 0.72/0.92 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 577 0.72/0.92 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.72/0.92 # Backward-subsumed : 23 0.72/0.92 # Backward-rewritten : 35 0.72/0.92 # Generated clauses : 24673 0.72/0.92 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 21649 0.72/0.92 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 23 0.72/0.92 # Paramodulations : 22176 0.72/0.92 # Factorizations : 6 0.72/0.92 # NegExts : 1122 0.72/0.92 # Equation resolutions : 618 0.72/0.92 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.72/0.92 # Propositional check models : 0 0.72/0.92 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.72/0.92 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.72/0.92 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.72/0.92 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.72/0.92 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.72/0.92 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.72/0.92 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.72/0.92 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.72/0.92 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.72/0.92 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.72/0.92 # Current number of processed clauses : 1805 0.72/0.92 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 184 0.72/0.92 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11 0.72/0.92 # Negative unit clauses : 112 0.72/0.92 # Non-unit-clauses : 1498 0.72/0.92 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16531 0.72/0.92 # ...number of literals in the above : 49590 0.72/0.92 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.72/0.92 # Current number of archived clauses : 688 0.72/0.92 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 803782 0.72/0.92 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 303925 0.72/0.92 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1724 0.72/0.92 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19368 0.72/0.92 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.72/0.92 # BW rewrite match attempts : 248 0.72/0.92 # BW rewrite match successes : 162 0.72/0.92 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.72/0.92 # Condensation successes : 0 0.72/0.92 # Termbank termtop insertions : 363462 0.72/0.92 0.72/0.92 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.72/0.92 # User time : 0.525 s 0.72/0.92 # System time : 0.019 s 0.72/0.92 # Total time : 0.544 s 0.72/0.92 # Maximum resident set size: 2540 pages 0.72/0.92 EOF